Departers: to "try" or permanently?

People go to "try" and it doesn't always work out. Especially today. Often it seems like an excursion, and there is a cognitive dissonance from the realization of why you actually left. In addition, it is not always possible to travel to the right country. The financial resource is limited, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to wander around the world in search of it. Excursion attitude to the environment is leveled by the realization that the existing source of income may disappear and no longer arise. In no case.

When leaving, it is desirable to have full awareness of 1) that you are looking for a different social environment with a complete discrepancy between the current and expected ones, and 2) that current life plans and tasks cannot be realized in the society that you leaving. So, for 1) it is necessary to understand the probability of its even worse deterioration, for 2) to be aware of yours plans and tasks with sufficient clarity - up to a clearly articulated business plan, "the business of life." Figuratively speaking, who is talking about Noether's theorem, and who has wiped the kitchen for mem. (And what - this is strategy of "small deeds". Strategy, Carl!)

The most radical and effective in terms of clarity of action is the mode of departure "dropping slippers" - here, as a rule, one does not have to choose either a country or an activity, and even more so, the "excursion effects" of local beauties disappear, because there is an escape "from", and not "to". It's definitely not a question of courage or education. And not even elderly parents: they are still paid a pension, but for young people, it happens that there is no work and no pensions (not everyone understands the latter, because how does it “not shine”? But like this!).

It should be remembered that a dictatorship like the Russian one is, as a rule, a regime of aggressive struggle against autonomous and personal agendas in the name of rafinated "values ??of the past" (that's why such dictatorships tend to trivialize ancient symbols) in order to maintain control, for which both old and young are brought up by propaganda in the spirit of the requirement to "be content with little" and a direct mockery of 1) the idea of self-realization outside the team and 2) the idea of self-realization as such. That's why are economic tales told about hundreds of failed startups (yes, failed - but the question is not in the number, but in the details and interpretations). And they are effectively brought up, with positive feedback. The implications of this represent a culture shock. Which also requires a clear awareness, but for running away in the "dropping slippers" mode, this also a trifle.

Добавить комментарий